Page 1 of 1

Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 12:05 pm
by CalStateTempe
are a garbage organization.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/th ... ins-trade/" target="_blank

Traded Cousin's for next to nothing.

I am a basketball nomad since the implosion of the Suns about 10 years ago, root for the W's out of fandom to Kerr and the Cats Alum, but no vested interest outside of that. Now that I'm living in Sac, want to support the local team, new arena, community etc, but man this is a terribly run franchise.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 12:14 pm
by TucsonClip
I went in deep on this elsewhere, as the trade angered me and im not even a Kings fan. Ill just sum it up like this: Vlade and Vivek are the equivalent of eight year olds running a freaking professional sports franchise.

Dump Boogie for nothing, pay Barnes to go away, likely pay Galloway to go away, dealt away two #1s to sign Rondo for one year, AND they like Buddy Hield that much (never been a fan and will never be a fan).

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:24 pm
by SCCats
People are going to say (and are, in fact, saying) the Kings got fleeced and that's fine.

A couple points:

1. Who is in the best position to know Cousin's true value (or lack of value)? The Kings.

2. The Kings looked at trades and perhaps this was the best they were offered.
a. Why might that be? Is Cousins one of those Marbury/Melo type talented players, but can't win with em?
b. If this was Cousin's trade value when he was making what, $24M a year, what would his trade value be next year when he's signed his 5 year, $209M contract (so about $42M a year)?

I get it that the guys running Sactown are idiots. And I hear the analysis that says Boogie brings $280M in value over five years going forward on projections, so he still might have value, even at a $209M contract. But if you know you want to get rid of him, if you know he's one of those "can't win with em" types, now is probably a better time to get rid of him than later.

It will be interesting to see what the Pelican's win percentage looks like with Boogie. We will see if it moves significantly...or not.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:36 pm
by Chicat
One addendum: If the Kings waive Galloway to dump his contract its going to cost them $5.4M extra NEXT year. So they would have thrown in Casspi for free to add money onto their cap sheet.

They had Cousins, Isiah Thomas, and Hassan Whiteside and now they have a bag of shit.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:28 pm
by TucsonClip
SCCats wrote:People are going to say (and are, in fact, saying) the Kings got fleeced and that's fine.

A couple points:

1. Who is in the best position to know Cousin's true value (or lack of value)? The Kings.
This is the man you are relying on...

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:30 pm
by TucsonClip
Chicat wrote:One addendum: If the Kings waive Galloway to dump his contract its going to cost them $5.4M extra NEXT year. So they would have thrown in Casspi for free to add money onto their cap sheet.
They also just waived Matt Barnes to open up a roster spot to complete the deal. They literally could have waived anyone else, or pulled off another trade, or worked on a buy out with Barnes. Instead, they are paying him $6.4 million next year to vacate his roster spot this year.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:34 pm
by Chicat
TucsonClip wrote:
Chicat wrote:One addendum: If the Kings waive Galloway to dump his contract its going to cost them $5.4M extra NEXT year. So they would have thrown in Casspi for free to add money onto their cap sheet.
They also just waived Matt Barnes to open up a roster spot to complete the deal. They literally could have waived anyone else, or pulled off another trade, or worked on a buy out with Barnes. Instead, they are paying him $6.4 million next year to vacate his roster spot this year.
It's like my 7 year old is in charge.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:38 pm
by TucsonClip
Chicat wrote:
TucsonClip wrote:
Chicat wrote:One addendum: If the Kings waive Galloway to dump his contract its going to cost them $5.4M extra NEXT year. So they would have thrown in Casspi for free to add money onto their cap sheet.
They also just waived Matt Barnes to open up a roster spot to complete the deal. They literally could have waived anyone else, or pulled off another trade, or worked on a buy out with Barnes. Instead, they are paying him $6.4 million next year to vacate his roster spot this year.
It's like my 7 year old is in charge.
Send over his resume and ill pass it along to Vivek. Sounds like hes qualified.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 3:13 pm
by CalStateTempe
Wow, TC, that is worse then I thought.

I mean they were only 1 game out of 8th place, and competing over the last month, this is just like blow it up and try to "sixer" it territory.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:15 pm
by TucsonClip
CalStateTempe wrote:this is just like blow it up and try to "sixer" it territory.
Except they would need a competent GM and their own first round draft picks.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:37 pm
by CalStateTempe
I loved watching cousins play. A head case yes, but sheer dominance when he wanted to be on.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:55 pm
by SCCats
After 3 quarters, Houston 100 NO 67

Those are some ugly plus minuses

http://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400900258" target="_blank

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:36 pm
by JMarkJohns
SCCats wrote:After 3 quarters, Houston 100 NO 67

Those are some ugly plus minuses

http://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400900258" target="_blank
Modern NBA has so much offensive skill.

Two Towers is gonna be interesting.

Still think Cousins may be available this offseason.

Probably means Gentry will be fired, which sucks.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:56 am
by CalStateTempe
Kinda digging the D'Fox and Justin Jackson youth connection.

The kings will be terrible this year and still have terrible management/ownership, but maybe next season with some experience the youth will be ready to rumble.

Hield has been fun to watch as well. Nice comeback last night fell short against the suns.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 10:16 pm
by Newportcat
I know one of the owners and they care more about the real estate play then winning basketball games

Crushed it from a real estate perspective

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 11:00 am
by jajoyce
Newportcat wrote:I know one of the owners and they care more about the real estate play then winning basketball games

Crushed it from a real estate perspective

Yes, it is developing nicely around the arena and it has done wonders for downtown Sacramento. I live right near there and love it. They are having problems with their development of a hotel/condominiums where the contractor has a $30M lien.

The team is awful though. They are the darlings of the town because of no competition. No big collegiate or pro sports teams. They cant even lose correctly as evidence by them beating Orlando last week.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 9:40 pm
by CalStateTempe
Are just a really dumb team...

Passed on Doncic for Bagley. As we all know, everyone know duke players suck in the pros.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 9:43 pm
by TucsonClip
CalStateTempe wrote:Are just a really dumb team...

Passed on Doncic for Bagley. As we all know, everyone know duke players suck in the pros.
|
|
|
|
v

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 7:06 am
by CalStateTempe
I am really fired up for this Walton hire!

Beyond the obvious homer interest I think this is a good fit for both parties.

Closer to mentorship with Kerr. Uptempo young players. Incredibly low expectations.

Given the keys to the franchise and get to mold to his liking.

Sacramento tends to treat CATS alum well. ;)

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2021 11:28 am
by Alieberman
Luke out

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2021 11:52 am
by Merkin

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2021 12:47 pm
by KaibabKat
Time to head to the Teepee to regroup.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:14 pm
by CatsbyAZ
Last night's Kings game stopped for a while to clean up a fan vomiting on the court - a metaphor?

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:36 pm
by dovecanyoncat
Mr. Creosote is a bucket fan.

Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 9:08 am
by CatsbyAZ
Kings 16 year playoff drought is over as of last night. Crushing the Blazers by 40. Next up is the NY Jets with a 12 year playoff drought.


Re: Sac Kings

Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 3:06 pm
by dovecanyoncat
Giving up all those offensive boards in the 3Q killed 'em.