Page 1 of 56

Kansas

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:52 pm
by Bear Down Vegas
Plays Kentucky tonight. Can they both lose? Please?

One of the only times ever I'm rooting for KU I guess.

Speaking of things I hate...did enfuego ever make it through the site change to post here? I'm guessing no.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 11:34 pm
by 1stNGrant Frys
did enfuego migrate over?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 6:34 am
by wyo-cat
Vote in the poll.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:08 am
by Catstatic
Didn't watch the Kentucky/Kansas game. Wish both teams could have been blown out. Oh well, if nothing else it should shut up the Jayhawk fans for awhile.

Go Cats!! (Arizona, that is.)

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:19 pm
by enfuego
If I created a new thread and the board saved it as a "draft", wth did it go?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:19 pm
by scumdevils86
:D

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:17 pm
by Chicat
enfuego wrote:If I created a new thread and the board saved it as a "draft", wth did it go?
The same place Bill Self's real hair went.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:12 pm
by CBCat
Didn't see that Kelly Oubre play for Kansas nor did I see him on the bench.
Anybody know if he is hurt or what is up?
Thought he was suppose to play as a freshman and be pretty good? Not so?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:17 pm
by KaibabKat
He played. 1 FGA. Rest of stat line was 0fer.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:18 pm
by enfuego
CBCat wrote:Didn't see that Kelly Oubre play for Kansas nor did I see him on the bench.
Anybody know if he is hurt or what is up?
Thought he was suppose to play as a freshman and be pretty good? Not so?
He played in the first half. He's just not very good right now. Thinking the game. He's behind two 5* players at his position right now, Svi and Greene.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:29 pm
by dirtbags
has oubre started yet? i thought he was supposed to be a one-and-done at ku. if not OAD, is there any concern that he could xfr?

kelly has plenty of time left, but to be fair to the kid, expecting him to be wiggins 2.0 is a pretty tall order

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 3:17 pm
by azcat34
Wow, the hometown refs pulled through Kansas tonight.

Sweet 16 max for that team this year.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 3:22 pm
by UAEebs86
azcat34 wrote:Wow, the hometown refs pulled through Kansas tonight.

Sweet 16 max for that team this year.
Up 21 at the half, and the game comes down to the last possession?

Count that as an L.

#enfuegologic

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 3:26 pm
by enfuego
UAEebs86 wrote:
azcat34 wrote:Wow, the hometown refs pulled through Kansas tonight.

Sweet 16 max for that team this year.
Up 21 at the half, and the game comes down to the last possession?

Count that as an L.

#enfuegologic
That argument only works when that happens against unranked teams. And is demonstrated by Arizona on a routine basis.

We got bored with the Utes and came out flat in the second half. Fourth win over a KenPom Top 20 team.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 4:18 pm
by CalStateTempe
So in what world is a game in Kansas City with the ginormous Jayhawk on the floor a neutral site game?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 10:49 pm
by Longhorned
Kansas is better than they seem because they're just more bored than other teams.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 11:02 pm
by JMarkJohns
It's a solid, albeit barely, win today. Solid because Self and Kansas typically find ways to lose games like these, and, recently, haven't fared well against teams Arizona beats routinely like Colorado and San Diego State.

Love that 'fueg's is puffing his chest over this. Solid, homecourt advantage, win.

Nothing more.

But the Michigan State, Georgetown, Florida games, the one's you also barely won, I'm not sure they'll be highly regarded much longer. Georgetown is already slipped to #21, and none looked that impressive. Considering Kansas's struggles to shoot over 44% vs. quality competition, I imagine it's only a matter of time before that 40-42% shooting bites them in the ass.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 11:20 pm
by enfuego
JMarkJohns wrote:It's a solid, albeit barely, win today. Solid because Self and Kansas typically find ways to lose games like these, and, recently, haven't fared well against teams Arizona beats routinely like Colorado and San Diego State.

Love that 'fueg's is puffing his chest over this. Solid, homecourt advantage, win.

Nothing more.

But the Michigan State, Georgetown, Florida games, the one's you also barely won, I'm not sure they'll be highly regarded much longer. Georgetown is already slipped to #21, and none looked that impressive. Considering Kansas's struggles to shoot over 44% vs. quality competition, I imagine it's only a matter of time before that 40-42% shooting bites them in the ass.
Kansas Kenpom SOS: 5
Arizona Kenpom SOS: 228

That shooting percentage is skewed by the Kentucky game. Take that game out and we're at 44-45% compared to Arizona's 48-49% against cupcakes. We're also shooting 45% from three compared to Arizona's 37%.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 12:17 am
by JMarkJohns
enfuego wrote:
JMarkJohns wrote:It's a solid, albeit barely, win today. Solid because Self and Kansas typically find ways to lose games like these, and, recently, haven't fared well against teams Arizona beats routinely like Colorado and San Diego State.

Love that 'fueg's is puffing his chest over this. Solid, homecourt advantage, win.

Nothing more.

But the Michigan State, Georgetown, Florida games, the one's you also barely won, I'm not sure they'll be highly regarded much longer. Georgetown is already slipped to #21, and none looked that impressive. Considering Kansas's struggles to shoot over 44% vs. quality competition, I imagine it's only a matter of time before that 40-42% shooting bites them in the ass.
Kansas Kenpom SOS: 5
Arizona Kenpom SOS: 228

That shooting percentage is skewed by the Kentucky game. Take that game out and we're at 44-45% compared to Arizona's 48-49% against cupcakes. We're also shooting 45% from three compared to Arizona's 37%.
You've shot worse than 44% in half your games, including today in basically a home game.

Gonzaga and SDSU each have top-30 defense, the latter a top-5.

Michigan State, Georgetown and Florida have like 10 losses already, so ranking is mostly in preseason expectations rather than actual results, and Kansas struggled to defeat them all.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 12:22 am
by JMarkJohns
It's actually worse than I thought.

You haven't shot above 42% since Tennessee despite multiple home/quasi-home games, and you've shot worse than 42% 6 times thus far, worse than 40% 4 times, worse than 38% 3 times.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:34 am
by cats101
Longhorned wrote:Kansas is better than they seem because they're just more bored than other teams.
:lol:

Enfuego is a joke

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 6:54 am
by azcat34
enfuego wrote:
UAEebs86 wrote:
azcat34 wrote:Wow, the hometown refs pulled through Kansas tonight.

Sweet 16 max for that team this year.
Up 21 at the half, and the game comes down to the last possession?

Count that as an L.

#enfuegologic
That argument only works when that happens against unranked teams. And is demonstrated by Arizona on a routine basis.

We got bored with the Utes and came out flat in the second half. Fourth win over a KenPom Top 20 team.
Kansas got bored? :lol: :lol:

Self didn't look very bored when they were down 5 with 4 minutes left and got the local stripes to start calling phantoms all over the court.

Utes had a terrible game from 3 point land (4-19) and Kansas made 21-23 from the line. Difference in the game and if those numbers are more in line with season averages Utah wins this game fairly easily.

Coupled with the fact that game was a de facto home environment, not seeing a big tournament run barring huge improvement from KU this year.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 7:23 am
by Chicat
enfuego wrote:We got bored with the Utes and came out flat in the second half.
So Bill Self has trouble motivating the Jayhawks to play a full 40 minutes at home against a top 15 team?

Good to know.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 1:13 pm
by enfuego
You build up a 21 point lead and you tend to coast. This team is young and against a team like Utah has to learn you just can't turn it back on.

Jmark your stats don't capture the level of competition Kansas is playing against versus the level of competition UA is playing (I am currently watching a replay of UA versus the powerhouse Utah Valley on the Pac 12 network right now Kenpom 280). I think Arizona's best "win" is against Gonzaga and if the referees called that blatant over the back and sent the Zags to the line in regulation, Arizona loses that game.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 1:15 pm
by ASUHATER!
enfuego wrote:You build up a 21 point lead and you tend to coast. This team is young and against a team like Utah has to learn you just can't turn it back on.

Jmark your stats don't capture the level of competition Kansas is playing against versus the level of competition UA is playing (I am currently watching a replay of UA versus the powerhouse Utah Valley on the Pac 12 network right now Kenpom 280). I think Arizona's best "win" is against Gonzaga and if the referees called that blatant over the back and sent the Zags to the line in regulation, Arizona loses that game.
Arizona didn't coast

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 1:28 pm
by cats101
enfuego wrote:You build up a 21 point lead and you tend to coast. This team is young and against a team like Utah has to learn you just can't turn it back on.

Jmark your stats don't capture the level of competition Kansas is playing against versus the level of competition UA is playing (I am currently watching a replay of UA versus the powerhouse Utah Valley on the Pac 12 network right now Kenpom 280). I think Arizona's best "win" is against Gonzaga and if the referees called that blatant over the back and sent the Zags to the line in regulation, Arizona loses that game.
By the looks of Wesley choking at the line nothing was guaranteed.

Looks like Kentucky just scored again

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 1:32 pm
by enfuego
ASUHATER! wrote:
enfuego wrote:You build up a 21 point lead and you tend to coast. This team is young and against a team like Utah has to learn you just can't turn it back on.

Jmark your stats don't capture the level of competition Kansas is playing against versus the level of competition UA is playing (I am currently watching a replay of UA versus the powerhouse Utah Valley on the Pac 12 network right now Kenpom 280). I think Arizona's best "win" is against Gonzaga and if the referees called that blatant over the back and sent the Zags to the line in regulation, Arizona loses that game.
Arizona didn't coast
Of course Arizona didn't coast. You can't coast when you are playing from behind the entire game.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 1:52 pm
by UAEebs86
If Arizona played the 13th-ranked team on a "neutral" court in Phoenix, built a 21 point lead, and let the game come down to the last possession, enflamo would be here posting about how soft and overrated Arizona was.

He focuses on one bad call in a game instead of looking at all the calls that went against Arizona that game.

He ignores the fact that the McKale crowd induced three misses in a row at the end of OT, but assumes they make them at the end of regulation.

He DVRs and watches the UVU game. Even Arizona fans don't do that. :lol: Obsess much?

Pure troll with no life.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 2:01 pm
by ASUHATER!
enfuego wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote:
enfuego wrote:You build up a 21 point lead and you tend to coast. This team is young and against a team like Utah has to learn you just can't turn it back on.

Jmark your stats don't capture the level of competition Kansas is playing against versus the level of competition UA is playing (I am currently watching a replay of UA versus the powerhouse Utah Valley on the Pac 12 network right now Kenpom 280). I think Arizona's best "win" is against Gonzaga and if the referees called that blatant over the back and sent the Zags to the line in regulation, Arizona loses that game.
Arizona didn't coast
Of course Arizona didn't coast. You can't coast when you are playing from behind the entire game.
We were behind to Michigan the entire game?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 2:02 pm
by AZCatGirl
Can't wait to hear why not coasting against Michigan doesn't count. They're just a cupcake this year? They're so bad that even coasting anyone can blow them out? We should've beat them by 40? All of the above?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 2:05 pm
by JMarkJohns
Quality of competition? Before Utah your three best wins had a total of 10 losses.

Arizona shot 45% against top-10 Gonzaga, a team with a top-30 defense.

You're a shitty offensive team.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:20 pm
by enfuego
JMarkJohns wrote:Quality of competition? Before Utah your three best wins had a total of 10 losses.

Arizona shot 45% against top-10 Gonzaga, a team with a top-30 defense.

You're a shitty offensive team.
And lost.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:20 pm
by enfuego
ASUHATER! wrote:
enfuego wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote:
enfuego wrote:You build up a 21 point lead and you tend to coast. This team is young and against a team like Utah has to learn you just can't turn it back on.

Jmark your stats don't capture the level of competition Kansas is playing against versus the level of competition UA is playing (I am currently watching a replay of UA versus the powerhouse Utah Valley on the Pac 12 network right now Kenpom 280). I think Arizona's best "win" is against Gonzaga and if the referees called that blatant over the back and sent the Zags to the line in regulation, Arizona loses that game.
Arizona didn't coast
Of course Arizona didn't coast. You can't coast when you are playing from behind the entire game.
We were behind to Michigan the entire game?
Gonzaga.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:22 pm
by enfuego
UAEebs86 wrote:
He DVRs and watches the UVU game. Even Arizona fans don't do that. :lol: Obsess much?

Pure troll with no life.
I live in Scottsdale. I have Cox Communication. It carries the Pac-12 Network. That same channel was showing a replay of the UVU game. A DVR was not involved. Make things up much? :lol:

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:24 pm
by JMarkJohns
enfuego wrote:
JMarkJohns wrote:Quality of competition? Before Utah your three best wins had a total of 10 losses.

Arizona shot 45% against top-10 Gonzaga, a team with a top-30 defense.

You're a shitty offensive team.
And lost.
So a win is a loss now? Don't open the subjective Pandora's box considering Kansas has barely beat a bout of 3-loss teams.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:42 pm
by enfuego
JMarkJohns wrote:
enfuego wrote:
JMarkJohns wrote:Quality of competition? Before Utah your three best wins had a total of 10 losses.

Arizona shot 45% against top-10 Gonzaga, a team with a top-30 defense.

You're a shitty offensive team.
And lost.
So a win is a loss now? Don't open the subjective Pandora's box considering Kansas has barely beat a bout of 3-loss teams.
Technical Loss. Like technically defaulting on a loan. Like I'm still technically a virgin. It may be a W on the scoreboard, but it is something that the selection committee could factor into a decision on whether to give Arizona the #1 seed in the West or give it to Gonzaga. If I were on the committee, and that game was the deciding factor, Gonzaga gets my vote. Gonzaga's SOS (Kenpom) is 49 versus Arizona at 228.

As to Kansas being a poor shooting team, I pointed out the facts in my earlier post, one of which was our comparative SOS:

Kansas Kenpom SOS: 5
Arizona Kenpom SOS: 228

Is it your position that Kansas would shoot as poorly against cupcakes like Utah Valley, as they would against strong defensive teams such as Kentucky?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:02 pm
by UAEebs86
DVR or replay - you have no fucking life and you are a troll.

Your obsession with Arizona basketball is frightening - you really should seek professional help.

I've asked you before at TOS and you always refuse to answer - why do you hate Arizona so much? Which player took your lunch money?

I know why we all hate Kansas - it's because of you.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:29 pm
by JMarkJohns
enfuego wrote:
JMarkJohns wrote:
enfuego wrote:
JMarkJohns wrote:Quality of competition? Before Utah your three best wins had a total of 10 losses.

Arizona shot 45% against top-10 Gonzaga, a team with a top-30 defense.

You're a shitty offensive team.
And lost.
So a win is a loss now? Don't open the subjective Pandora's box considering Kansas has barely beat a bout of 3-loss teams.
Technical Loss. Like technically defaulting on a loan. Like I'm still technically a virgin. It may be a W on the scoreboard, but it is something that the selection committee could factor into a decision on whether to give Arizona the #1 seed in the West or give it to Gonzaga. If I were on the committee, and that game was the deciding factor, Gonzaga gets my vote. Gonzaga's SOS (Kenpom) is 49 versus Arizona at 228.

As to Kansas being a poor shooting team, I pointed out the facts in my earlier post, one of which was our comparative SOS:

Kansas Kenpom SOS: 5
Arizona Kenpom SOS: 228

Is it your position that Kansas would shoot as poorly against cupcakes like Utah Valley, as they would against strong defensive teams such as Kentucky?
Yes, and I've pointed out that the juggernauts on your schedule are merely names on a jersey this year beyond Kentucky and Utah, as Florida, Michigan State and Georgetown have a combined 10 losses as I type. That's not good.

And you're an idiot with "technical loss" as if somehow blowing a 20-point lead and barely hanging on vs. Utah in a defacto home game wouldn't also be considered a technical loss.

And Kansas hasn't just struggled against the big names on their schedule. They've had some stinkers vs. the no-name squads they've played as well.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:39 pm
by azcat49
I think the ceiling for this jayhawk team is the sweet 16 although they could sneak into a great 8 game if they can stay off the 4 line.

AZ will be the west 1 seed barring a poor PAC season, which is doubtful. We will play for a regional championship and a FF.

KU just is too inexperienced and doesn't shoot it well and defensively is subject to lapses. AZ lapses come on offense but they will be in every game due to that defense. We have too much leadership and PG play to not make a deep run. KU is talented but inexperience and spotty PG play will do them in earlier than fungus wants

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:43 pm
by Bosy Billups
enfuego wrote:
UAEebs86 wrote:
He DVRs and watches the UVU game. Even Arizona fans don't do that. :lol: Obsess much?

Pure troll with no life.
I live in Scottsdale. I have Cox Communication. It carries the Pac-12 Network. That same channel was showing a replay of the UVU game. A DVR was not involved. Make things up much? :lol:
Fueg, you secretly like Arizona, the program, coach, players, style, philosophy. You respect it. No need to hide it anymore, it's okay to have Kansas as your #1 team, but I think I know your #2 team, even if you don't admit it. Heck, wouldn't be surprised if it's 1a and 1b at this point.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 5:06 pm
by enfuego
Bosy Billups wrote:
enfuego wrote:
UAEebs86 wrote:
He DVRs and watches the UVU game. Even Arizona fans don't do that. :lol: Obsess much?

Pure troll with no life.
I live in Scottsdale. I have Cox Communication. It carries the Pac-12 Network. That same channel was showing a replay of the UVU game. A DVR was not involved. Make things up much? :lol:
Fueg, you secretly like Arizona, the program, coach, players, style, philosophy. You respect it. No need to hide it anymore, it's okay to have Kansas as your #1 team, but I think I know your #2 team, even if you don't admit it. Heck, wouldn't be surprised if it's 1a and 1b at this point.
1997

Never Forget!

:P

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 5:10 pm
by enfuego
JMarkJohns wrote:
enfuego wrote:
JMarkJohns wrote:
enfuego wrote:
JMarkJohns wrote:Quality of competition? Before Utah your three best wins had a total of 10 losses.

Arizona shot 45% against top-10 Gonzaga, a team with a top-30 defense.

You're a shitty offensive team.
And lost.
So a win is a loss now? Don't open the subjective Pandora's box considering Kansas has barely beat a bout of 3-loss teams.
Technical Loss. Like technically defaulting on a loan. Like I'm still technically a virgin. It may be a W on the scoreboard, but it is something that the selection committee could factor into a decision on whether to give Arizona the #1 seed in the West or give it to Gonzaga. If I were on the committee, and that game was the deciding factor, Gonzaga gets my vote. Gonzaga's SOS (Kenpom) is 49 versus Arizona at 228.

As to Kansas being a poor shooting team, I pointed out the facts in my earlier post, one of which was our comparative SOS:

Kansas Kenpom SOS: 5
Arizona Kenpom SOS: 228

Is it your position that Kansas would shoot as poorly against cupcakes like Utah Valley, as they would against strong defensive teams such as Kentucky?
Yes, and I've pointed out that the juggernauts on your schedule are merely names on a jersey this year beyond Kentucky and Utah, as Florida, Michigan State and Georgetown have a combined 10 losses as I type. That's not good.

And you're an idiot with "technical loss" as if somehow blowing a 20-point lead and barely hanging on vs. Utah in a defacto home game wouldn't also be considered a technical loss.

And Kansas hasn't just struggled against the big names on their schedule. They've had some stinkers vs. the no-name squads they've played as well.
Well, Kenpom disagrees with these teams being merely the names on the front of their jerseys. They are all still in the Kenpom top 20. That said, Arizona has more experience, but less talent. Mason is not a natural point guard, but he's getting better every game. Our biggest weakness is our lack of post depth. We really only have Ellis and Alexander and a rotation of role players. So, it should be an interesting year. UConn won the title last year with less post depth, so don't count us out.

I think McCollum is overrated as is Tarczewski. Rondae is a great defender, Johnson gets better each game, and Ashley is one of the best 4's in the game. That said, I don't see Arizona getting past the Sweet 16 this year. But Kansas has a legitimate shot of winning the N.I.T. this year.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 5:26 pm
by JMarkJohns
You can't see because your eyes are closed.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 7:58 pm
by waysouthcat
Well, Kenpom disagrees with these teams being merely the names on the front of their jerseys. They are all still in the Kenpom top 20. That said, Arizona has more experience, but less talent. Mason is not a natural point guard, but he's getting better every game. Our biggest weakness is our lack of post depth. We really only have Ellis and Alexander and a rotation of role players. So, it should be an interesting year. UConn won the title last year with less post depth, so don't count us out. :?:

I think McCollum is overrated as is Tarczewski. Rondae is a great defender, Johnson gets better each game, and Ashley is one of the best 4's in the game. That said, I don't see Arizona getting past the Sweet 16 this year. But Kansas has a legitimate shot of winning the N.I.T. this year.
Contradict yourself much? It's okay to admit that Arizona is just better than Kansas this year.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:14 pm
by 77HoyaCat4Ever
If Kansas wins the NT this year then my Schwanz is 12 inches long

Re: Kansas

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 4:52 am
by CalStateTempe
LMAO! Hoya bringing it.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 7:39 am
by Bosy Billups
Fuego: "I think McCollum is overrated as is Tarczewski. Rondae is a great defender, Johnson gets better each game, and Ashley is one of the best 4's in the game. That said, I don't see Arizona getting past the Sweet 16 this year. But Kansas has a legitimate shot of winning the N.I.T. this year."

1. Rondae is a great defender
2. Johnson gets better each game (he's the best player on the team, or right next to RHJ and BA)
3. Ashley is one of the best 4's in the game

Zeus may have been overrated, but he plays great defense and is a top college C

TJMC is a top level college point guard, and don't forget PJC for depth.

You don't see this team making it past the Sweet 16 this year? What 16 teams in the nation are better?

PS - the X factor, this team is NCAA Tournament Battle Tested, up to the Elite 8, losing on a last second shot. They've been there before.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 9:47 am
by Bear Down Vegas
UAEebs86 wrote:If Arizona played the 13th-ranked team on a "neutral" court in Phoenix, built a 21 point lead, and let the game come down to the last possession, enflamo would be here posting about how soft and overrated Arizona was.
This. x100.

I missed you enfuego. I for one am glad you made it over here. :lol:

Re: Kansas

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:27 am
by salim'sheadband
Since the start of 2011, in the very heart of Self's "Woodenesque" run, Kansas has won only eight more games than us and lost only six fewer. Most of those eight games can be explained by Kansas's typically lucky 2012 run where they beat a double digit seed, beat a double digit seed, beat a double digit seed (which, for Kansas, is actually pretty shocking), beat the one seed whose best player broke his wrist, and didn't have to play the other one seed on their half of the bracket because their center was academically ineligible. (Why not include 2010? Well Miller wasn't fortunate enough to inherit a team that returned 10/12 players from a title-game team, like Self was when he took over the Kansas job, so I figured that year could probably get cut off.)

Besides 2012 they've never advanced further in the tournament than us in that time. In those three years they've had two losses to double-digit seeds and an all-timer choke-job against Michigan (true story: Kansas's KenPom win probability in that game was, best as I can tell, as high as it could go without actually winning). And we will be going farther in the tournament. Again.

As far as personnel, Kansas's stud wing recruit is playing fewer minutes than Landen Lucas. Of course, this won't stop him from going pro, along with Alexander, one of Kansas's only two meaningful players over 6'7". Wayne Selden and Brannen Greene still have not decided that they want to be full-time basketball players but I'm sure they'll be around for a couple more years to frustrate and disappoint Kansas fans. As far as when Oubre and Alexander leave, hey, at least they'll be replaced by Kansas's 2015 recruiting class, which at the moment, um, looks like...

Image

Meanwhile, Arizona's got three five-stars and a four-star locked up for 2015 even assuming we don't get Ivan Rabb. Those players will go nicely next year with our returning sophomore center (didn't he play in Kansas?), our sophomore power forward, our senior shooting guard, our junior wing who might be our best returning player, and our sophomore point guard who is a star in the making.

But that's none of my business.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 1:59 pm
by splitsecond
This board is now complete with Enfuego's triumphant appearance.