Page 12 of 17

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:34 am
by rgdeuce
MrBug708 wrote:
rgdeuce wrote:You're reaching, even for a troll.
Way to own it
We already own the conference. Cant be too greedy

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 10:47 am
by Beachcat97
MrBug708 wrote:Lonzo didn't register either and he was a top 5 prospect. They play for his dad's AAU team, they aren't worried about being the top ranked kid, exposure in all star games, or getting as many offers as possible.
Good points. The Balls are a humble, down-to-earth bunch. Never craving the spotlight, rarely concerned about public perception.

Nice to see UCLA making inroads with those 2nd and 3rd tier recruits, while OR has somehow moved past them as the Pac's only other current elite program.

UCLA has finished behind AZ in the standings 7 times in the last decade, by the way. When should we expect Alford to turn this trend around?

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:32 pm
by MrBug708
Beachcat97 wrote:
MrBug708 wrote:Lonzo didn't register either and he was a top 5 prospect. They play for his dad's AAU team, they aren't worried about being the top ranked kid, exposure in all star games, or getting as many offers as possible.
Good points. The Balls are a humble, down-to-earth bunch. Never craving the spotlight, rarely concerned about public perception.

Nice to see UCLA making inroads with those 2nd and 3rd tier recruits, while OR has somehow moved past them as the Pac's only other current elite program.

UCLA has finished behind AZ in the standings 7 times in the last decade, by the way. When should we expect Alford to turn this trend around?
Isn't this why you got banned? Because you kept proclaim Arizona couldn't get it done and make a Final Four and that UCLA was going to own the conference?

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 10:12 pm
by RichardCranium
Isn't this why you got banned? Because you kept proclaim Arizona couldn't get it done and make a Final Four and that UCLA was going to own the conference?
Um, not to defend Bug, but IIRC, he got banned for welching on a bet, not for having a stupid cock-a-Mamie opinion.

And anyway, why is this thread so GD long and ongoing? Isn't there something better than overrated BB players from some Podunk LA tertiary school to talk about during the offseason?

Like reviving the See-thru Dress thread?

Or which is better - the Original Z-Man BBQ sandwich from Kansas City or the copy cat Z-Man BBQ sandwich from Melbourne?

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:23 am
by Bangkok Wildcat
RichardCranium wrote:
Isn't this why you got banned? Because you kept proclaim Arizona couldn't get it done and make a Final Four and that UCLA was going to own the conference?
Um, not to defend Bug, but IIRC, he got banned for welching on a bet, not for having a stupid cock-a-Mamie opinion.

And anyway, why is this thread so GD long and ongoing? Isn't there something better than overrated BB players from some Podunk LA tertiary school to talk about during the offseason?

Like reviving the See-thru Dress thread?

Or which is better - the Original Z-Man BBQ sandwich from Kansas City or the copy cat Z-Man BBQ sandwich from Melbourne?
No kidding Cranium.....12 pages devoted to Lonzo's Balls....ughhhh. Time to just kill this thread or move it under UCLA.

Also, you're right in that BC got banned for welching on a bet that we had no chance of winning the game at UCLA.....that and his negativity about the team.......he seems to have improved with the negativity issue.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:08 am
by MrBug708
Yup. A bet because he didn't think Arizona can get it done. He usually sours on Arizona every couple of years and turns into a UCLA fan. This year saw him get called a welcher for not believing in Zona

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:45 am
by RichardCranium
Um, not to defend Bug,...
Opps, yeah, I meant BC97, not Bug. Sorry about that.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:05 am
by MrBug708
I knew what you meant :)

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 2:50 pm
by MrBug708

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 4:55 pm
by Bangkok Wildcat
MrBug708 wrote:For Bangkok

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thepla ... e-gym/amp/" target="_blank
Um, no thanks Bug :-)......Would rather read something more interesting like the US Tax Code vs a love letter between the Balls. I only replied to agree with Cranium on how boring this thread is.....Bug, please keep your Balls to yourself ;-)

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:15 pm
by MrBug708
The juicy nugget is that it is looking kinda real that the Lakers aren't going to take Ball.

I was just giving you insight on how Lonzo is, since you were convinced he's a certain way :)

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:31 am
by MrBug708
After getting blownout by 50 last game, Melo's team went to double OT against the Compton Magic before falling

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 8:10 pm
by MrBug708

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 10:24 am
by HiCat
Lonzo's shot.. needs fixing?

http://www.cbssports.com/college-basket ... nt-broken/" target="_blank

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 10:56 am
by Spaceman Spiff
HiCat wrote:Lonzo's shot.. needs fixing?

http://www.cbssports.com/college-basket ... nt-broken/" target="_blank
His form is ugly, but it's not changing. You hope he can keep making it, that's all.

Heck, Reggie Miller's off hand slapped his shooting hand after release. It doesn't have to be pretty. It has to go in. It went in last year. He just needs to keep that up.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:22 pm
by MrBug708

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 2:45 pm
by Beachcat97
No sh*t, Lavar. Only one of the three is worth a scholarship to a D-1 program.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 3:18 pm
by MrBug708
Beachcat97 wrote:No sh*t, Lavar. Only one of the three is worth a scholarship to a D-1 program.
Two of the three are 5 stars, but only one of the three deserves a scholarship offer?

Wait, you are talking about the star power of a UCLA offer. You know where a kid not deserving of any offers, gets offered by UCLA, and jumps to a 5 star? But that only applies to one of them, not both? There is the beachcat UCLA homer we all know and love

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 3:46 pm
by Spaceman Spiff
MrBug708 wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:No sh*t, Lavar. Only one of the three is worth a scholarship to a D-1 program.
Two of the three are 5 stars, but only one of the three deserves a scholarship offer?

Wait, you are talking about the star power of a UCLA offer. You know where a kid not deserving of any offers, gets offered by UCLA, and jumps to a 5 star? But that only applies to one of them, not both? There is the beachcat UCLA homer we all know and love
Well, we all sort of knew that Lonzo is way better at basketball and LiAngelo is better looking by default.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:16 pm
by MrBug708
True -I've just never encountered a 5 star kid who isn't deserving of at least ONE "Div 1" offer. Surely ASU would gladly him if UCLA didn't already have his commitment

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:26 pm
by Spaceman Spiff
MrBug708 wrote:True -I've just never encountered a 5 star kid who isn't deserving of at least ONE "Div 1" offer. Surely ASU would gladly him if UCLA didn't already have his commitment
Look, I just don't find Lonzo very attractive.

I don't know why you want to make this about scholarship offers and recruiting ranks. I'm just trying to discuss the attractiveness of the Ball family.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 11:21 pm
by Beachcat97
Lonzo is the only 5-star in that family. But it's cute that Bruin fans think otherwise. So far, the Ball era is off to a fine beginning at UCLA. Making history, one Ball brother at a time.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:25 am
by MrBug708
Thankfully the internet exists to a)Prove you wrong again and b)keep track of the nonsense you say

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:16 am
by rgdeuce
Spaceman Spiff wrote:
HiCat wrote:Lonzo's shot.. needs fixing?

http://www.cbssports.com/college-basket ... nt-broken/" target="_blank
His form is ugly, but it's not changing. You hope he can keep making it, that's all.

Heck, Reggie Miller's off hand slapped his shooting hand after release. It doesn't have to be pretty. It has to go in. It went in last year. He just needs to keep that up.
Do you think they are going to move his gather/initial motion on jumpers a little bit more to the right? I have no issues w his form outside of that, and only because it limits him shooting off the dribble to one side.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:44 am
by Beachcat97
MrBug708 wrote:Thankfully the internet exists to a)Prove you wrong again and b)keep track of the nonsense you say
No Ball will (a) win a Pac title or (b) do anything even slightly significant while at UCLA.

Thankfully the Balls exist to keep Bruin fans distracted from the reality of where their program is at.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:14 am
by rgdeuce
Image

I would have the ultimate respect for Lavar if he had this door knocker on his front door.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:06 pm
by MrBug708
Beachcat97 wrote:
MrBug708 wrote:Thankfully the internet exists to a)Prove you wrong again and b)keep track of the nonsense you say
No Ball will (a) win a Pac title or (b) do anything even slightly significant while at UCLA.

Thankfully the Balls exist to keep Bruin fans distracted from the reality of where their program is at.
I'm stunned you are standing by what you originally claimed. Who could have seem that coming?

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:48 pm
by 84Cat
I don't want my Lakers to take Lonzo so I don't have to hear his dad talk shit. This is like a bad dream.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:23 pm
by Spaceman Spiff
84Cat wrote:I don't want my Lakers to take Lonzo so I don't have to hear his dad talk shit. This is like a bad dream.
Lonzo can play and Lavar is the real problem.

I'd be more worried that the D'lo cap dump doesn't net PG or LeBron/Westbrook.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:23 pm
by rgdeuce
youre getting a great point guard, you cant be complaining about Dad.

Lonzo Ball is one of only a couple UCLA guys I didnt loathe. Thats not going to last that long now that hes a laker

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 7:12 pm
by rgdeuce
U just have to laugh when you can get a TJ Leaf at 18.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 11:07 pm
by Puerco
rgdeuce wrote:youre getting a great point guard, you cant be complaining about Dad.

Lonzo Ball is one of only a couple UCLA guys I didnt loathe. Thats not going to last that long now that hes a laker
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/1971 ... l-no-lavar

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:54 am
by Spaceman Spiff

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:40 pm
by UAEebs86

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:59 pm
by Merkin

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:25 am
by Gato Salvaje
Merkin wrote:
Lavar is the Uncle Rico of basketball.

Didnt he say he could take Jordan 1 on 1?

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2017 11:42 am
by Jefe
Image

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2017 1:53 pm
by SCCats
I wonder if LaMelo's WWE appearance might be a "peace out scholi" situation.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:42 am
by rgdeuce
Don't see how it would - see Russell Wilson signing a professional baseball contract and playing two seasons before returning to play football at Wisconsin.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 9:22 am
by Spaceman Spiff
rgdeuce wrote:Don't see how it would - see Russell Wilson signing a professional baseball contract and playing two seasons before returning to play football at Wisconsin.
Plus, I'm sure the WWE directed any money to Lavar. It's the same tightrope of literally building a Brand on the back of his kids that he's been walking for a while now.

If the NCAA was ok with him pimping BBB merchandise while Lonzo and LiAngelo were/are in college, Lavar getting money from the WWE is just more of the same.

It circles back to my broken record rant about how illogical NCAA rules are. Lonzo couldn't profit off his likeness. Lavar is literally only famous because of Lonzo, and he can try to conver that into $ all day long and somehow that is ok.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 3:48 pm
by PennZona20
rgdeuce wrote:Don't see how it would - see Russell Wilson signing a professional baseball contract and playing two seasons before returning to play football at Wisconsin.

I think he's referring to the N-Bombs dropped on national TV.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 6:43 pm
by rgdeuce
One of the most commonly overheard words in my high school locker room during basketball season.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 8:05 pm
by PennZona20
100% agreed. And he's not going to lose his ship over it, but it's a bad look on national tv. Vince wasn't happy when his new image WWE took a hit lol.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 9:00 pm
by SCCats
rgdeuce wrote:One of the most commonly overheard words in my high school locker room during basketball season.
When people have to start releasing statements about what you said, that's not a good spot to put yourself in.

Also if, for example, there might be a party somewhere looking to cut their ties to a certain family, this might give them a convenient excuse to do so. "The University says...not representative of UCLA values...my hands are tied..." etc etc.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 6:58 pm
by Chicat

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 8:53 pm
by Spaceman Spiff
1 for 11 from 3 and 2 for 15 overall. Ouch.

If LaVar hadn't hyped him so much, the ugliness in his first game wluldn't seem like much. It feels like a lot of pressure for summer league.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 9:17 pm
by CalStateTempe
oh man he is gonna be so better then seth curry. :lol:

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 10:37 pm
by MrBug708
Definitely was pressing too hard to impress, which is probably to back up his dad. He needs to lay some of those balls up and not dish it out so much. Who would have thought UCLA would have had better shooters than this summer league team. Did look like Ingram enjoyed playing with him

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:34 am
by Bangkok Wildcat
CalStateTempe wrote:oh man he is gonna be so better then seth curry. :lol:
Don't forget that he's already 'sewn up Rookie of the Year' and guaranteed to bring the Lakers back to the playoffs this season!!! Smh and lol.

I really hope that DeAaron Fox outshines him and makes the Lakers regret passing on him....saw Fox interviewed before the Draft and after working out for the Lakers....seems like a good kid.

Re: Lonzo Ball

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 5:02 am
by Chicat
Didn't the bRuins go to Europe or somewhere last summer and Ball stunk it up? I would not take too much from this game.

Only thing I saw of concern in the little bit I watched was that I think he may have trouble getting and making good shots from distance in late shot clock situations.