Bear Down Wildcats

UAEebs86 wrote:

ghostwhitehorse wrote:USC 28 'tah 27 final.

'tah went for two and didn't get it.

OK, when the hell did "Utah" get shortened to 'tah?

I bet you guys say "Zona" too...

I feel like if we keep it on the ground, we can do this. No mistakes.

catgrad97 wrote:

MrBug708 wrote:You guys must not see many of these calls in your games. UCLA is usually on the receiving end of these terrible penalties. I agree that the rule is stupid

Not sure if you are serious or not. This was not a penalty. The PAC-12 head of officials came on the broadcast and said it wasn't a penalty. Of course, two days later, the PAC-12 issued a letter.

With all of the times UCLA has come from multiple touchdowns behind under Rosen to pull out a miracle late? When were all these "receiving ends"?

https://gojoebruin.com/2017/09/11/ucla- ... non-calls/" target="_blank

We also had a targeting call on us when our 5'10 player got called on one similar when he tried to tackle the Stanford TE, who measures in at 6'5.

You can just see RichRod taking the air out of the ball already...which has always been a mistake...

ELLISON IS GOD!

I envy Arizona's ability to catch the ball

A month to see the field lol

And . . .BOOM. Ellison to the 6.

Nick. TD!

OBVIOUS PI not called BTW....

Now. . .D. . .

MrBug708 wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:

MrBug708 wrote:You guys must not see many of these calls in your games. UCLA is usually on the receiving end of these terrible penalties. I agree that the rule is stupid

Not sure if you are serious or not. This was not a penalty. The PAC-12 head of officials came on the broadcast and said it wasn't a penalty. Of course, two days later, the PAC-12 issued a letter.

With all of the times UCLA has come from multiple touchdowns behind under Rosen to pull out a miracle late? When were all these "receiving ends"?

https://gojoebruin.com/2017/09/11/ucla- ... non-calls/" target="_blank

We also had a targeting call on us when our 5'10 player got called on one similar when he tried to tackle the Stanford TE, who measures in at 6'5.

Yeah, you guys never get the breaks against Hawaii, do you?

qwertyus wrote:OBVIOUS PI not called BTW....

Agreed!

That was for you Bug.

Fucking beautiful.....

qwertyus wrote:OBVIOUS PI not called BTW....

More yardage with the catch so they let it go.

Cannot believe that Dawkins is a much better practice player than Tate. No frickin way

Merkin wrote:

qwertyus wrote:OBVIOUS PI not called BTW....

More yardage with the catch so they let it go.

Cannot believe that Dawkins is a much better practice player than Tate. No frickin way

Tate for all time QB.

catgrad97 wrote:

MrBug708 wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:

MrBug708 wrote:You guys must not see many of these calls in your games. UCLA is usually on the receiving end of these terrible penalties. I agree that the rule is stupid

Not sure if you are serious or not. This was not a penalty. The PAC-12 head of officials came on the broadcast and said it wasn't a penalty. Of course, two days later, the PAC-12 issued a letter.

With all of the times UCLA has come from multiple touchdowns behind under Rosen to pull out a miracle late? When were all these "receiving ends"?

https://gojoebruin.com/2017/09/11/ucla- ... non-calls/" target="_blank

We also had a targeting call on us when our 5'10 player got called on one similar when he tried to tackle the Stanford TE, who measures in at 6'5.

Yeah, you guys never get the breaks against Hawaii, do you?

I dont understand your angst? You asked where UCLA was on the receiving end of a bad targeting call. Did you want more? I can find you a couple more if you'd like?

Merkin wrote:Cannot believe that Dawkins is a much better practice player than Tate. No frickin way

Truth

Merkin wrote:

qwertyus wrote:OBVIOUS PI not called BTW....

More yardage with the catch so they let it go.

Cannot believe that Dawkins is a much better practice player than Tate. No frickin way

I know. There just no way. It’s not even close.

SCCats wrote:

Merkin wrote:Cannot believe that Dawkins is a much better practice player than Tate. No frickin way

Truth

His light just turned on? I guess it happens, or so I have read.

TuiTouchdown wrote:

Merkin wrote:

qwertyus wrote:OBVIOUS PI not called BTW....

More yardage with the catch so they let it go.

Cannot believe that Dawkins is a much better practice player than Tate. No frickin way

Tate for all time QB.

Tate legit should be in the Heisman conversation if he keeps this up. If he had played all season? No doubt in the conversation. He definitely beats Houston.

Dawkins can't throw for shit, and Tate's even a better runner. RR made a big, stupid mistake.

Let's send Colorado cookies. Their late hit has saved our season...

We've had a lot of injuries

MrBug708 wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:

MrBug708 wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:

MrBug708 wrote:You guys must not see many of these calls in your games. UCLA is usually on the receiving end of these terrible penalties. I agree that the rule is stupid

Not sure if you are serious or not. This was not a penalty. The PAC-12 head of officials came on the broadcast and said it wasn't a penalty. Of course, two days later, the PAC-12 issued a letter.

With all of the times UCLA has come from multiple touchdowns behind under Rosen to pull out a miracle late? When were all these "receiving ends"?

https://gojoebruin.com/2017/09/11/ucla- ... non-calls/" target="_blank

We also had a targeting call on us when our 5'10 player got called on one similar when he tried to tackle the Stanford TE, who measures in at 6'5.

Yeah, you guys never get the breaks against Hawaii, do you?

I dont understand your angst? You asked where UCLA was on the receiving end of a bad targeting call. Did you want more? I can find you a couple more if you'd like?

Something against an actual Pac-12 opponent would bolster your case, beyond that Stanford TE call, which I'm not doubting you on.

No angst here, but c'mon Bug: targeting calls against Hawaii? That game was never in doubt, and those calls did not swing momentum the way this last one still might.

Rosen already gets enough protection without kicking someone out of the game smaller than he is.

ref

Sacks!? What is happening???

Brown with the sack!

CaliCat69 wrote:

SCCats wrote:

Merkin wrote:Cannot believe that Dawkins is a much better practice player than Tate. No frickin way

Truth

His light just turned on? I guess it happens, or so I have read.

You mean his "light turned on" the instant Dawkins got hurt against Colorado?

The timeline just doesn't add up.

WILBORN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fucking beautiful!

Who had Kylan Wilborn in RAP????

SCCats wrote:

CaliCat69 wrote:

SCCats wrote:

Merkin wrote:Cannot believe that Dawkins is a much better practice player than Tate. No frickin way

Truth

His light just turned on? I guess it happens, or so I have read.

You mean his "light turned on" the instant Dawkins got hurt against Colorado?

The timeline just doesn't add up.

I think there was an injury problem. Probably was good to go if needed, but was back to 100% for CO.

Should prob go ahead and pull Rosen

SCCats wrote:

CaliCat69 wrote:

SCCats wrote:

Merkin wrote:Cannot believe that Dawkins is a much better practice player than Tate. No frickin way

Truth

His light just turned on? I guess it happens, or so I have read.

You mean his "light turned on" the instant Dawkins got hurt against Colorado?

The timeline just doesn't add up.

JFM?

Wilborn is a beast

qwertyus wrote:Dawkins can't throw for shit, and Tate's even a better runner.

And

1. Tate can run the read/option. Dawkins can't.
2. Tate can make decent decisions when plays break down. Dawkins can't make any decisions at any point.

TuiTouchdown wrote:

SCCats wrote:

CaliCat69 wrote:

SCCats wrote:

Merkin wrote:Cannot believe that Dawkins is a much better practice player than Tate. No frickin way

Truth

His light just turned on? I guess it happens, or so I have read.

You mean his "light turned on" the instant Dawkins got hurt against Colorado?

The timeline just doesn't add up.

I think there was an injury problem. Probably was good to go if needed, but was back to 100% for CO.

Then why didn't he start against Colorado?

"Arizona, some confusion with their special teams..."

Yet another polite way of expressing "WTF is the unit only having NINE guys on the field?"

catgrad97 wrote:
Something against an actual Pac-12 opponent would bolster your case, beyond that Stanford TE call, which I'm not doubting you on.

No angst here, but c'mon Bug: targeting calls against Hawaii? That game was never in doubt, and those calls did not swing momentum the way this last one still might.

Rosen already gets enough protection without kicking someone out of the game smaller than he is.

That play didn't swing momentum. UCLA had a first down on the play and was looking at first and goal from the 9 and instead had first and goal from the 4.

What protection does Rosen get that anyone else doesn't? The call was correct, the rule is stupid. My comment was just that, the rule is dumb and it was nice to not have a player ejected based on a weak rule. You are interjecting emotion into something I already agreed with.

You also forget that the targeting call in Hawaii also cost us a defender for the next game, one in which we lost.

SCCats wrote:
Truth

His light just turned on? I guess it happens, or so I have read.[/quote]

You mean his "light turned on" the instant Dawkins got hurt against Colorado?

The timeline just doesn't add up.[/quote]

I think there was an injury problem. Probably was good to go if needed, but was back to 100% for CO.[/quote]

Then why didn't he start against Colorado?[/quote]

Chalk it up to going with the devil you know? Not 100% sure, but Tate didn't have a ton of in-game experience to go on. Not defending the decision, just trying to think through the process.

Frell, Udub?

SCCats wrote:

qwertyus wrote:Dawkins can't throw for shit, and Tate's even a better runner.

And

1. Tate can run the read/option. Dawkins can't.
2. Tate can make decent decisions when plays break down. Dawkins can't make any decisions at any point.

Bingo. Even making allowances for injuries, how does Dawkins win the job out of the freaking spring game when he is barely a DUAL threat--and doesn't possess the decision-making skills to even be THAT?!

He can't. Run. The offense.

But speaking of coming out of nowhere, how about Ellison tonight? Such hands.

Oh god.

Nice punt coverage. . .

Refs are giving this away! What did he even do?

TuiTouchdown wrote:Oh god.

Again, special teams.

Sometimes I honestly wonder if RichRod learned his staff management from TecmoBowl. You need a legit coach on punts and kicks.

Last time we lost to Arizona in an embarrassing fashion, we had a regime change. It would be nice to see it happen again, but DG has no guts

The refs are doing everything they can to get UCLA in the game again

FUCK LARRY SCOTT.

TuiTouchdown wrote:Refs are giving this away! What did he even do?

He hurt Rosen's feelings.

Get. FUCKED.