Page 14 of 17

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 5:17 am
by EastCoastCat
UAEebs86 wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:52 pm
Image

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 5:46 am
by Chicat
If only he hadn’t graduated UA a virgin…

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 7:44 am
by EastCoastCat
Chicat wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 5:46 am If only he hadn’t graduated UA a virgin…
That's pretty hard to do. You got to be a complete and total asshole. Someone like

Image

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 1:59 pm
by Olsondogg

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 3:50 pm
by pc in NM
Olsondogg wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 1:59 pm
Most of whom will begin reading up on the college basketball season in the next week or so...

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2022 7:10 am
by Alieberman
Anyone noticing the amount of Buddy Boeheim apologists there have been in the media? From Bilas, Goodman and many more... all are doing backflips to describe Buddy as the nicest guy you will ever meet... he doesn't deserve a suspension... etc

Such a disgusting good ol boys club

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2022 7:21 am
by Irish27
Alieberman wrote: Thu Mar 10, 2022 7:10 am Anyone noticing the amount of Buddy Boeheim apologists there have been in the media? From Bilas, Goodman and many more... all are doing backflips to describe Buddy as the nicest guy you will ever meet... he doesn't deserve a suspension... etc

Such a disgusting good ol boys club
I remember when Edgerson intentionally elbowed that BYU player and knocked him out. Many were shocked, saying he was really a nice guy who wants to be a kindergarten teacher. That it was out of character. Thinking back, it's crazy that Gene only got a one-game suspension. That BYU player's career was over after that punch.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2022 8:11 am
by Olsondogg
Irish27 wrote: Thu Mar 10, 2022 7:21 am
Alieberman wrote: Thu Mar 10, 2022 7:10 am Anyone noticing the amount of Buddy Boeheim apologists there have been in the media? From Bilas, Goodman and many more... all are doing backflips to describe Buddy as the nicest guy you will ever meet... he doesn't deserve a suspension... etc

Such a disgusting good ol boys club
I remember when Edgerson intentionally elbowed that BYU player and knocked him out. Many were shocked, saying he was really a nice guy who wants to be a kindergarten teacher. That it was out of character. Thinking back, it's crazy that Gene only got a one-game suspension. That BYU player's career was over after that punch.
He actually played a few games after that but chose to retire soon thereafter due to lingering effects from the concussion and a virus infection as well.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:32 pm
by Olsondogg
Walton is a national treasure. His rant on the little chairs was hilarious, just the best.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:43 pm
by dovecanyoncat
Olsondogg wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:32 pm Walton is a national treasure. His rant on the little chairs was hilarious, just the best.
He's had more repair than the Eisenhauer Interstate system. If any of us had gone through 38 orthopedic operations we'd have expired ages ago.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:46 pm
by Longhorned
Olsondogg wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:32 pm Walton is a national treasure. His rant on the little chairs was hilarious, just the best.
That was a monument.

Walton has called some great games but he's been peak Walton recently especially. Tonight was Vin Scullyesque.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:58 pm
by Chicat
W/out Pasch, Walton is almost tolerable.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:59 pm
by Longhorned
Chicat wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:58 pm W/out Pasch, Walton is almost tolerable.
And yet it really isn't Pasch's fault.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 10:00 pm
by azgreg
Olsondogg wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:32 pm Walton is a national treasure. His rant on the little chairs was hilarious, just the best.
He loves cougars.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 10:01 pm
by dovecanyoncat
Longhorned wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:59 pm
Chicat wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:58 pm W/out Pasch, Walton is almost tolerable.
And yet it really isn't Pasch's fault.
In and of himself I don't really care for Pasch. It is his manner of suffering Walton that endears him to me.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 10:14 pm
by AZCatGirl
Chicat wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:58 pm W/out Pasch, Walton is almost tolerable.
Makes me wish Pac 12 would use him more so we could get this Walton all the time. Pasch/Walton is beyond tired.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 10:33 pm
by Merkin
I can't believe he didn't say "THROW IT DOWN BIG MAN" when Koloko missed that one foot easy lay in.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 10:38 pm
by dovecanyoncat
Anybody read the Tucson.com article on Walton? Pasch and Bernstein and someone else's anecdotes?

Pasch said "My first time announcing a game with Bill was such and such a date for such and a such a tournament. Bill said it never happened."

Yup.

"It's Dave, right?"

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2022 6:59 am
by UAEebs86

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2022 7:38 am
by CatFan1399
When FESPN talking heads pick against us, I feel like it is disrespect. When they actually pick Arizona to win, I feel like they are trying to pull a reverse jinx because I’m still bitter and petty and hate them for what they did to this program.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2022 10:10 am
by Postmaster
The issue with Walton/Pasch is that they became a shtick. We feel FESPN forced stupid gimmicks and interviews upon them. They added the split screen for a couple seasons.
Announcers should enhance the game. FESPN made the broadcast about the announcers and the game was just background.
If they would just do the game normally they would be fine.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2022 1:00 pm
by dovecanyoncat
CatFan1399 wrote: Sun Mar 13, 2022 7:38 am When FESPN talking heads pick against us, I feel like it is disrespect. When they actually pick Arizona to win, I feel like they are trying to pull a reverse jinx because I’m still bitter and petty and hate them for what they did to this program.
This simply shows that you are a good and normal person.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:33 am
by Longhorned
Just based on Myron Metcalf's write-up of what you need to know about the 68 teams, I'd definitely pick Arizona for an early upset if I hadn't watched this season for myself.

I'd know that Gonzaga's few losses are irreproachable, Kansas is awesome, Baylor may have some disadvantages from injuries, and Sean Miller created a cloud of criminality that Tommy Lloyd is dissipating but Arizona's numbers this year are against minor league competition, end of story.

Continuing to read, by the time I get to UCLA and learn that this team could be headed for the Final Four, I wonder whether I'd make the connection that UCLA, too, only played in a weak league.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:39 am
by Chicat
Longhorned wrote: Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:33 am Just based on Myron Metcalf's write-up of what you need to know about the 68 teams, I'd definitely pick Arizona for an early upset if I hadn't watched this season for myself.

I'd know that Gonzaga's few losses are irreproachable, Kansas is awesome, Baylor may have some disadvantages from injuries, and Sean Miller created a cloud of criminality that Tommy Lloyd is dissipating but Arizona's numbers this year are against minor league competition, end of story.
I read a few of these takes, and honestly it seems like writers are more reacting to the CBS talking heads picking Arizona to the Final Four when the brackets were revealed.

But the truth is that NOBODY knows. The best thing about the tourney is that it’s not predictable. Gonzaga’s weak conference was why they’d never break through… until they did. Duke’s blue blood legacy means they go to the Final Four every year… except they don’t. Etc…

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:45 am
by Longhorned
Chicat wrote: Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:39 am
Longhorned wrote: Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:33 am Just based on Myron Metcalf's write-up of what you need to know about the 68 teams, I'd definitely pick Arizona for an early upset if I hadn't watched this season for myself.

I'd know that Gonzaga's few losses are irreproachable, Kansas is awesome, Baylor may have some disadvantages from injuries, and Sean Miller created a cloud of criminality that Tommy Lloyd is dissipating but Arizona's numbers this year are against minor league competition, end of story.
I read a few of these takes, and honestly it seems like writers are more reacting to the CBS talking heads picking Arizona to the Final Four when the brackets were revealed.

But the truth is that NOBODY knows. The best thing about the tourney is that it’s not predictable. Gonzaga’s weak conference was why they’d never break through… until they did. Duke’s blue blood legacy means they go to the Final Four every year… except they don’t. Etc…
But in the world of trying to predict through reason, two of the four CBS experts are picking Illinois over Arizona in the Sweet 16. Are we perhaps underdogs for that game? Fine.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-baske ... -anaylsis/

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 7:05 am
by Chicat
That’s only because Illinois and Cockburn destroyed us at McKale earlier in the season.



Wait a tick…

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 7:19 am
by EastCoastCat
I try not to read too much - other than this board - during this week.

Suggest a lot of you do the same as it will only irritate you.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 7:58 am
by pc in NM
Longhorned wrote: Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:45 am
Chicat wrote: Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:39 am
Longhorned wrote: Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:33 am Just based on Myron Metcalf's write-up of what you need to know about the 68 teams, I'd definitely pick Arizona for an early upset if I hadn't watched this season for myself.

I'd know that Gonzaga's few losses are irreproachable, Kansas is awesome, Baylor may have some disadvantages from injuries, and Sean Miller created a cloud of criminality that Tommy Lloyd is dissipating but Arizona's numbers this year are against minor league competition, end of story.
I read a few of these takes, and honestly it seems like writers are more reacting to the CBS talking heads picking Arizona to the Final Four when the brackets were revealed.

But the truth is that NOBODY knows. The best thing about the tourney is that it’s not predictable. Gonzaga’s weak conference was why they’d never break through… until they did. Duke’s blue blood legacy means they go to the Final Four every year… except they don’t. Etc…
But in the world of trying to predict through reason, two of the four CBS experts are picking Illinois over Arizona in the Sweet 16. Are we perhaps underdogs for that game? Fine.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-baske ... -anaylsis/
I am confident that none of those CBS guys watched the Pac-12 Tourney, and only wish I knew them personally so I could goad them into putting their money where their mouthes are...

... I'm sure they all fully supported Michigan's preseason ranking in the top-5!!!!

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 4:44 am
by U.P. Zona Fan
I'm sure they did too, up until the point we blasted Michigan in Vegas, then u of m were complete frauds because how could little old struggling Arizona with a new coach bludgeon such a great team.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 9:44 am
by UAEebs86

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:11 am
by Postmaster
This Goodman guy is a tool

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:22 am
by Chicat
Postmaster wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 8:11 am This Goodman guy is a tool
I wish he’d gone to ASU.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 3:18 pm
by UAEebs86

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:43 pm
by UAEebs86

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:06 pm
by EastCoastCat
Was that Schla-suck?

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 4:31 am
by g32knights
EastCoastCat wrote: Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:06 pm Was that Schla-suck?
John Teitel Hoops HD, whatever that is.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 10:38 am
by azgreg
What does everybody think of how Reggie Miller is doing? I think he's been pretty good.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:55 pm
by Postmaster
Reggie got my order wrong at Wendy’s the other day.
So, not so good.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 7:57 pm
by Postmaster
Candice Parker needs to figure out how to remember her notes so she can look at camera instead of looking down at desk.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 8:02 pm
by UAEebs86
azgreg wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 10:38 am What does everybody think of how Reggie Miller is doing? I think he's been pretty good.
I still remember all of McKale chanting "Reggie sucks!" so I am incapable of saying anything nice about him.

Though I will admit I did like the choke sign at Spike Lee.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 8:04 pm
by EastCoastCat
I’m all for women behind the mic but they need to step up their game.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 8:38 pm
by Bangkok Wildcat
EastCoastCat wrote: Fri Mar 18, 2022 8:04 pm I’m all for women behind the mic but they need to step up their game.
Most qualified/talented SHOULD be the one for the job IMHO….no need to throw people in there just to fill some numbers. SMH.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 10:31 pm
by Olsondogg
The crew today was horrendous, from Avery Johnson telling a “joke” that nobody but him laughed at, to the female stating that WSU was attempting to “pull the upset” leading into a commercial as Arizona led by 18.

Just garbage.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2022 11:33 pm
by Postmaster
Seems like they are throwing women out here to make up for the inequities in the facilities last year.

I also don’t like the three person announce team, whether it’s men, women or mixed.

Is Brunson doing any games? Everyone on the boards loved her this year.

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 7:04 pm
by Fishclamps
Lol

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 7:05 pm
by UAEebs86
Is Rex back on the opioids?

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 7:09 pm
by azgreg

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 7:14 pm
by UAEebs86
God Shammgod was our championship year. They knocked off Duke.

Pete Gillen - “Certainly Duke is Duke, they’re on TV more than Leave it to Beavah reruns”

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:39 pm
by UAEebs86

Re: Best/Worst analysts/commentators/announcers

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:43 pm
by 97cats
i have to say the "bringing the house down" call on the nut dangler was pretty good - super genuine and in the moment and the house was on FIRE.