Bear Down Wildcats

Merkin wrote:

NYCat wrote:RR seriously needs to go. Can't win with this "talent"

SDCAT23 wrote:This team will not win more than 3 games. That being said with the way football works they'll probably be a surprise team and end up bowl eligible.

PHXCATS wrote:

SDCAT23 wrote:This team will not win more than 3 games. That being said with the way football works they'll probably be a surprise team and end up bowl eligible.

Heavy Favorites
NAU
UTEP

Slight Favorites or Toss Ups or Slight Dogs

Houston
Cal
Oregon
Oregon State
asu

Heavy Dogs
Utah
Colorado
Washington State
UCLA
USC

I see at least four wins and likely five or six

chiefzona wrote:

PHXCATS wrote:

SDCAT23 wrote:This team will not win more than 3 games. That being said with the way football works they'll probably be a surprise team and end up bowl eligible.

Heavy Favorites
NAU
UTEP

Slight Favorites or Toss Ups or Slight Dogs

Houston
Cal
Oregon
Oregon State
asu

Heavy Dogs
Utah
Colorado
Washington State
UCLA
USC

I see at least four wins and likely five or six

Good list. Right now I would put Oregon, ASU and Houston has heavy dogs as well.

ASUHATER! wrote:Oregon has enough talent to not be down for long. I very much doubt they'll be anywhere near as bad this year as last year.

cordera89 wrote:That not even Garbage writing that just an honesty assessment.

Puerco wrote:

cordera89 wrote:That not even Garbage writing that just an honesty assessment.

That writing had so little content that I would have criticized it if it'd been posted here, much less being presented on what appears to be a professional sports site. Garbage.

cordera89 wrote:

Puerco wrote:

cordera89 wrote:That not even Garbage writing that just an honesty assessment.

That writing had so little content that I would have criticized it if it'd been posted here, much less being presented on what appears to be a professional sports site. Garbage.

Why criticize it when it doesn't meet your standard on how it should be written.

catgrad97 wrote:

cordera89 wrote:

Puerco wrote:

cordera89 wrote:That not even Garbage writing that just an honesty assessment.

That writing had so little content that I would have criticized it if it'd been posted here, much less being presented on what appears to be a professional sports site. Garbage.

Why criticize it when it doesn't meet your standard on how it should be written.

That's exactly why people criticize writing.

azgreg wrote:If it met his standards he wouldn't need to criticize it.

carcassdragger wrote:How much time and effort is wasted trying to decipher or respond to these inane musings?

UAdevil wrote:Jesus....

cordera89 wrote:

catgrad97 wrote:

cordera89 wrote:

Puerco wrote:

cordera89 wrote:That not even Garbage writing that just an honesty assessment.

That writing had so little content that I would have criticized it if it'd been posted here, much less being presented on what appears to be a professional sports site. Garbage.

Why criticize it when it doesn't meet your standard on how it should be written.

That's exactly why people criticize writing.

It not a seriously matter on what the article said about RR when it doesn't meet your own standard on what it should say.

cordera89 wrote:

UAdevil wrote:Jesus....

I guess you got nothing else to say but why don't you and Jesus take a walk together.

UAdevil wrote:

cordera89 wrote:

UAdevil wrote:Jesus....

I guess you got nothing else to say but why don't you and Jesus take a walk together.

I've about had enough of you.

cordera89 wrote:

UAdevil wrote:Jesus....

I guess you got nothing else to say but why don't you and Jesus take a walk together.

EVCat wrote:I think we will be better than people expect.

Which, clearly, isn't all that good. But we have something going offensively when either JJ or Nick are running. We were a 2 pt conversion (should have) from knocking off that UW team, and boatraced ASU once Samaje learned how to be a running back. There are going to be teams who just grind us, but we have enough to win 5 or 6 games on the high end. We also have enough depth issues to be right back where we were by the end of last year.

azcat49 wrote:He is special for sure

threenumberones wrote:Did he just say Arizona University?

scumdevils86 wrote:I'm getting old. If something is happening after 10 pm it means I won't be involved. Oh well.

What You Need To Know About The Arizona Offense

You know what you’re getting with Arizona. The defense is going to be optional for long stretches, but the offense is going to make up for the problems on the other side of the ball in shootout after shootout. But that didn’t happen last year.

The Wildcats were crushed by injuries in the backfield, having a hard time getting settled in at quarterback early on, and lost the top running backs to major injuries before the midseason. Fortunately, the parts are back, but how long can they all stay on the field?

Brandon Dawkins and Khalil Tate will battle it out for the starting quarterback job, while the backfield is very deep and – potentially – extremely dangerous if J.J. Taylor and Nick Wilson can get and stay healthy.

There has to be a more efficient passing game, with Shun Brown needing some help from the rest of the receiving corps, and the O line has to be far more physical and consistent, but again, much of that comes with health.

PHXCATS wrote:
Heavy Favorites
NAU
UTEP

Slight Favorites or Toss Ups or Slight Dogs

Houston
Cal
Oregon
Oregon State
asu

Heavy Dogs
Utah
Colorado
Washington State
UCLA
USC

I see at least four wins and likely five or six

ramcat wrote:http://tucson.com/sports/arizonawildcat ... ff292.html

chiefzona wrote:Heard the abandon ship siren.

chiefzona wrote:Heard the abandon ship siren.